Thailand Approves Extradition to U.S. of Accused Credit Card Hacker

March 8, 2010

The extradition to the U.S. of a Malaysian man allegedly involved in hacking credit card information has been approved by a Thai court. The man, Gooi Kokseng, is accused of causing massive losses for victims in the U.S. Kokseng will be held in Thailand for the next 30 days in the event that he decides to appeal the ruling.

Kokseng, also known by the alias Delpiero, is alleged to be a member of a crime ring that has caused more than $150 million dollars in losses through hacking aimed at the United States and Southeast Asia. This information comes from a report in the Bangkok Post.

Kokseng was arrested following the filing of a request by U.S. authorities with the Thai Foreign Ministry. Kokseng could be imprisoned for over a year if convicted of the crime, according to another report.

These types of cybercrime cases often span national borders. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, last year they extradited two Romanians to the U.S. on charges tied to a major phishing scam. The U.S. has also cracked down on cyber crimes by having the Federal Bureau of Investigation embed agents with law enforcement authorities in Estonia, Ukraine and the Netherlands. These agents assist those authorities in investigations of international cybercrimes.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbassociates.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Continued Fight Over Netherlands-United States Extradition

February 25, 2010

A Somali man fighting extradition to the U.S. on terrorism charges has argued in a Dutch court that he is innocent and should be released.

Mohamud Said Omar is accused of providing money to the Somali Islamist group al-Shabab. It is also alleged that around 20 youths of Somali descent have traveled to Somalia from the United States since 2007 to help the group. This group is believe by U.S. authorities to engage in terrorist activities.

Omar was arrested at the request of the U.S. government in November of 2009. Since that time he has been held in a high-security Dutch prison. Although he has residency in the U.S., he had been living in a center for would-be asylum seekers in the Netherlands for nearly a year prior to his arrest.

There has been 14 people charged in ongoing U.S. federal investigations into the travels of young men traveling to Somalia to fight over a period of two years starting in 2007. These individuals are alleged of activities that include recruiting and raising funds for the trips, engaging in terrorist acts in Somalia, and perjury.

In the extradition request, U.S. officials state that they plan to charge Omar with providing or conspiring to provide “material support to a foreign terrorist organization,” and “conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim or injure.” However, it has been argued that the specific acts Omar is said to have committed would not be considered crimes in the Netherlands. Under the principle of dual criminality, the crimes upon which one would be extradited must be a crime in both the country requesting the extradition and the country requested to extradite the one accused of the crime. If it is not a crime in both countries and there is dual criminality langauge in the extradition treaty, then the requested state does not have to extradite the individual.

Although an initial ruling in the case should be forthcoming in the next few weeks, Omar’s extradition is not likely for many months at the earliest.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbassociates.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Polanski Extradition Put On Hold

February 15, 2010

Roman Polanski, remains on house arrest secured by a $4.5-million bond.

However, the Swiss Ministry’s deputy director said that a decision on Polanski’s case would not be made until courts in California had a definitive ruling on whether the director could be sentenced without returning to the U.S. Currently, such an issue is not pending before any California court, although Polanski’s legal team has said they will appeal a lower court judge’s refusal last month to sentence him in absentia.

As a result of these comments it seems that the timeline governing when the conclusion of Polanski’s case will depend on how long Polanski’s U.S. attorneys — and Los Angeles County prosecutors — pursue various appeals.

The U.S. Department of Justice has not commented on the status of the extradition request other than to say that the case is still pending.

Article 7 of the U.S.-Government of the Swiss Confederation Extradition Treaty states that if a person whose extradition has been requested was convicted in absentia, the Executive Authority of the United States and the Requested State may refuse extradition unless the Requesting State gives such assurances as the Requested State considers sufficient to safeguard the rights of defense of the person sought.

More information available on this case via the Los Angeles Times here.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbassociates.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


U.S. Supreme Court Will Not Block Extradition of Noreiga

February 10, 2010

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused the request of former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega to block his extradition to France. Noreiga faces drug charges in France which are similar to those that have led to his imprisonment in the U.S.

The court did not provide reasoning for denying the appeal, although Justices Thomas and Scalia objected stating that the case of Noriega raises important questions about how the courts should handle cases arising from the government’s attempt to prosecute terrorists. Noriega was ousted after the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1989. He has since been convicted of drug racketeering and other charges. At trial the judge presiding over the case declared him a prisoner of war.

Prior to the end of Noreiga’s sentence, the United States filed papers supporting France’s request that he be extradited there to face drug charges. Although courts there have already convicted him in absentia, France has promised him a new trial.

Noriega has argued that the Geneva Conventions holds that prisoners of war must be returned to their home countries, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta said federal law does not allow Noriega to rely on the treaties to challenge the extradition. The Supreme Court decided not to review that ruling.

It is ironic that the 11th Circuit would not allow Noreiga to rely on treaties to challenge his extradition, when in fact it is a treaty, the U.S.-France Bilateral Extradition Treaty, which is allowing for Noreiga’s extradition to France in the first place.

Article 1 of the extradition treaty between the United States and France, entitled Obligation to Extradite, states that [t]he Contracting States agree to extradite to each other, pursuant to the provisions of this Treaty, persons whom the competent authorities in the Requesting State have charged with or found guilty of an extraditable offense. Extradition Treaty, U.S.-Fr., art. 1, Apr. 23, 1996, S. Treaty Doc. No. 105-13 (2002). As such, despite Noreiga’s status as a prisoner of war, the treaty seemingly allows for his extradition to France.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbassociates.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share